5 thoughts on “Do you have to take legal responsibility when driving and killing dogs?”

  1. According to the relevant provisions of the “Road Traffic Accident Handling Procedures”, vehicles crashing animals do not belong to traffic accidents. In addition, animals are not allowed on highways and national roads. When encountering such cases, the traffic police department generally does not establish a case.

    Secondly, in accordance with the “Road Traffic Safety Law”, animals should be trapped by the owner on the road. The owner responded to the chickens to circle, and the chickens walked randomly on the road, obviously not in compliance with animal management regulations. From the perspective of civil law, as the private property of the owner, animals are obliged to take care of it. Therefore, animals that have been killed and injured when motor vehicles are driving normally, and they should not bear responsibility.

    This animals have no right to live in a legal sense, and just look at property as property.

    The analysis of legal issues should be advanced, such as the transformation of facts into legal facts, causal relationships into legal cause and effect, and the relationship between things into legal relationships. We can analyze, and the facts, relationships, cause and effects we usually perceive are not all legal levels, so it will cause many misunderstandings.

    The expansion information:

    Criminal law

    Article 133 violates transportation management regulations. If death or cause major losses to public and private property, it will be sentenced to imprisonment or detention of less than three years; those who escape after transportation or have other particularly bad circumstances after the traffic accident shall be sentenced to three years and seven years. More than seven years of imprisonment.

    The escape from traffic accidents refers to a kind of illegal behavior of the parties knowing that they had had a traffic accident. In order to escape the accident of the accident, they deliberately escaped the scene of the accident and did not report to the public security organs. There are two cases: 1. People and cars escape from the scene of the accident after the accident;

    Escape after traffic accident is a very harsh nature and a very serious plot. To this end, the parties should bear serious consequences of adversely for themselves.

    The road traffic safety law stipulates that if the traffic accident is escaped, the traffic management department of the public security organ is revoked to the motor vehicle driver’s license, and the motor vehicle driving license shall not be re -obtained for life. That is, it is usually referred to as lifelong driving. If the victim is killed due to escape, it is imprisoned in accordance with the Criminal Law Department of more than 7 years. The new law has strengthened the punishment of escape from traffic accidents.

  2. It is necessary to distinguish whether a dog or a wild dog, such as the family dog, which belongs to the owner’s property. The driver is considered to destroy the property, and the escape may constitute an escape. Whether to meet the standard for file.
    [Legal basis]
    “The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China”
    1133 violations of transportation management regulations, and major accidents occur, causing serious injuries, death or public and private property suffering. For major losses, in prison or detention of less than three years; those who escape after the transportation or other particularly harsh plots will be sentenced to three years and seven years in prison; those who die due to escape will be sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

  3. Pay content for time limit to check for freenAnswer Hello, I am a cooperative lawyer of Baidu Consulting. I have received your problem. There are more people who are consulting at present. Please wait for two minutes. Kiss, you are helping you solve the problem.nAccording to the relevant provisions of the “Road Traffic Accident Handling Procedures”, vehicles crashing animals do not belong to traffic accidents. In addition, animals are not allowed on highways and national roads. When encountering such cases, the traffic police department generally does not establish a case.nSecondly, in accordance with the “Road Traffic Safety Law”, animals should be trapped by the owner on the road. The owner responded to the chickens to circle, and the chickens walked randomly on the road, obviously not in compliance with animal management regulations. From the perspective of civil law, as the private property of the owner, animals are obliged to take care of it. Therefore, animals that have been killed and injured when motor vehicles are driving normally, and they should not bear responsibility. Small animals have no right to live in a legal sense, and they only look at property as property.nGenerally, the dog is killed or injured, and the vehicle is damaged. The personal property of the dog as the owner should be injured or killed. At the same time, the accident sometimes causes casualties of the vehicle. Therefore, the “car crashing dog” accident meets the constituent elements of traffic accidents and should be a “traffic accident”.nArticle 45 of the “Regulations on Road Traffic Accident Handling Procedures” also make specific regulations. The responsibility for the “car hit the dog” traffic accident is to analyze the severity of the behavior of the vehicle driver and the dog owner on the accident or error.n3 morenBleak

  4. No, if the dog does not tie the rope, then there is no responsibility to kill, and you can also let the dog owner compensate. If the dog is tied, the general car is mainly compensated.

  5. If the dog is killed under the control of the owner, it is deemed to have caused property losses, similar to an accident between motor vehicles and pedestrians, then the motor vehicle should bear the liability for no fault in accordance with the provisions of Article 76 of the “Road Traffic Safety Law”. If the breeding animals cause damage to others, the animal breeder or manager shall bear the liability of infringement, but it can prove that the damage is caused by the intention of the infringer intentionally or major negligence, and may not bear or reduce the responsibility. Therefore, if the dog is separated from the owner’s control and running around the road, it constitutes interference with the traffic order, not only does it have no right to request compensation, but on the contrary, if the accident causes losses to motor vehicles or others, it must also bear the liability for damage to the victim.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top